|
THE
GLEMBAYS press clipping |
|
Tomislav
Čadež, Globus, 19. 12. 2001 These are impressive performances directed in a very sophisticated way, conceptually and specially in acting. First of all, I think that Anurov noted Krleža’s subtle sociobiological leitmotive, which regards people as if they were monkeys, mamals, and regards the conflicts between them as conflicts of genes; which are perturbed, and made tragic, precisely by consciuosness, by culture. He showed, for our standards almost unreachable, a skillfull work with actors, stylisticly compact and meaningful acting. Every move, intonation, step, consciously chosen, so that it carefully fits, in all, the thoughtful tone and flow of the performance. |
| Zlatko
Vidačković, Vijenac, 27. 12. 2001. SEQUENCE OF RADICAL SOLUTIONS |
| In
all, the director in this show reached for a sequence of radical
solutions which have completely changed Krleža’s drama. |
| Anatolij
Kudrjavcev, Slobodna Dalmacija, 16. 12. 2001. KNOCKED OUT KRLEŽA |
| If
Split’s CNT should be given any merit in regards to Krleža’s
celebration jubilee, then it’s unexplainable that his work has been
staged in such a vandalized way which doesn’t add anything to theatre
nor to Krleža. On the contrary, Krleža
will probably because of this performance turn a few times in his grave. |
| Dubravka
Vrgoč, Vjesnik, 16. 12. 2001. TAKING A PEEK AT THE GLEMBAY’S TORMENTS |
| A
cult dramatic text, saturated by innumerable interpretations, many of
which offered an almost mythical portrayal of the destruction of
bourgoisie in our surroundings, stereotype glembay
sindrome and downfall of a decadent family, to which Anurov tried to
assign a different meaning. He
wanted the anxiety-ridden dramatic triangle – the insolube
relationship between father, son and the fatal Baroness Castelli,
burdened by the traumatic shadows of the past and neurotic present, to
be seen from the distance, searching for the archetypical glembay
original sin and glembay repent. |
| Vlatko
Perković, Hrvatsko slovo, 21. 12. 2001. HOMMAGE TO GLEMBAY DESTINY |
| Russian
director Aleksandar Anurov and set designer Victor Kharitonenko
approached The Glembay’s disregarding the academic, sociologically
contextual characteristics which have burdened this capital drama by
Miroslav Krleža for the last seventy years. Instigated by the basic
reflex of investigating the essential phenomena of theatre acting,
taught by the “theatrical school” of pedagogue and director Anatolij Vasiljev, his student Anurov
doesn’t lay the action in the genre, and thus the piece’s Ibsen like
realism doesn’t follow the established scenic realizations. Anurov is more interested in treating the text as material
for producing a (original) theatrical statement about The Glembays and The
Glembays M. Krleža.
He is mainly interested in the “theatrical playing on the
theme”. And from this
point of departure, from this subjectivity of the work, focus the piece
in a phenomenological
motivated theatre, Anurov continually runs away from the framework of
the piece, especially from the certainty of its realistic happenings and
it flows into some kind of dreamlike, sometimes surreal, projection of a thousand pictures. |